STET this STAT: a grammar emergency thread!

we don't know but perhaps a fellow anorak will - ask them here
User avatar
humblebee
Posts: 10539
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 4:33 pm
Last.fm: http://www.last.fm/user/atomicbeatboy
Location: Sheffields
Contact:

Re: STET this STAT: a grammar emergency thread!

Post by humblebee » Wed Jan 13, 2010 2:50 pm

soft revolution wrote:Which of these sentance ends would be better in a document

...the organisation who you are delivering the workshop for.

or

...the organisation for whom you are delivering the workshop.

The first one is probably more like how I'd say it but there's debate over whether the second one would be preferable if it's written down.
That is exactly what I was talking about above: bending over so far backwards to avoid finishing sentences with a pronoun - which you don't even need to do in modern English - that you do it in the middle of a sentence as well.

There's no reason at all why the second one should be seen as more 'correct' than the first, in either written or spoken English, so if you prefer the first, go for it.

(Personally, I'd leave out the "who" as well. And replace "delivering" with "running" because I hate "delivering" with a passion that verges on blue murder. But maybe that's just me.)

User avatar
Colin
Posts: 1834
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 11:56 pm
Last.fm: http://www.last.fm/user/colinbmx
Location: Glasgow
Contact:

Re: STET this STAT: a grammar emergency thread!

Post by Colin » Wed Jan 13, 2010 2:58 pm

humblebee wrote:There's no reason at all why the second one should be seen as more 'correct' than the first, in either written or spoken English, so if you prefer the first, go for it.

(Personally, I'd leave out the "who" as well. And replace "delivering" with "running" because I hate "delivering" with a passion that verges on blue murder. But maybe that's just me.)
I'm glad you've said that, because I posted a response to that effect earlier then thought, 'nah, I better wait until someone who knows what they're talking about comes along' because I wasn't sure about the pronoun bit.

User avatar
soft revolution
Posts: 2058
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 6:48 pm
Last.fm: http://www.last.fm/user/duncydunc
Location: somewhere in the bullring
Contact:

Re: STET this STAT: a grammar emergency thread!

Post by soft revolution » Wed Jan 13, 2010 3:00 pm

Thanks Pete, that'll tidy it up nicely.

I think I'm getting better at cutting out unneccesary words, and reading this thread does help.
And by me, I mean, Flexo.

User avatar
humblebee
Posts: 10539
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 4:33 pm
Last.fm: http://www.last.fm/user/atomicbeatboy
Location: Sheffields
Contact:

Re: STET this STAT: a grammar emergency thread!

Post by humblebee » Wed Jan 13, 2010 3:02 pm

Colin wrote:I'm glad you've said that, because I posted a response to that effect earlier then thought, 'nah, I better wait until someone who knows what they're talking about comes along' because I wasn't sure about the pronoun bit.
Oops, I meant preposition, not pronoun! Don't ever rely too much on me knowing what I'm talking about.

User avatar
Colin
Posts: 1834
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 11:56 pm
Last.fm: http://www.last.fm/user/colinbmx
Location: Glasgow
Contact:

Re: STET this STAT: a grammar emergency thread!

Post by Colin » Wed Jan 13, 2010 3:38 pm

That's the one bit I know *nothing* about. Things like what a pronoun is just never stuck with me. Either that or I wasn't taught it at school, or wasn't listening.

User avatar
indiehorse
Posts: 1941
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:50 am
Last.fm: http://www.last.fm/user/
Location: Nottingham
Contact:

Re: STET this STAT: a grammar emergency thread!

Post by indiehorse » Wed Jan 13, 2010 6:22 pm

Colin wrote:That's the one bit I know *nothing* about. Things like what a pronoun is just never stuck with me. Either that or I wasn't taught it at school, or wasn't listening.
A pronoun is a word that can be used in place of a noun, like 'he', 'she', 'they', 'it', 'this', 'that'...
I don't really know how to describe a preposition, but it's words like for 'for', 'on', 'in'...

I don't think they taught me about pronouns or prepositions at school; they were too busy teaching the other kids how to used full stops and commas. Bloody mixed-ability classes.

User avatar
nanski
Posts: 1072
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:53 am
Last.fm: http://www.last.fm/user/
Location: she lives by the castle

Re: STET this STAT: a grammar emergency thread!

Post by nanski » Thu Mar 11, 2010 7:55 am

you would never use "however" and "provided that" together, would you?
big hole! big hole! big hole! big man! big man!

User avatar
nanski
Posts: 1072
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:53 am
Last.fm: http://www.last.fm/user/
Location: she lives by the castle

Re: STET this STAT: a grammar emergency thread!

Post by nanski » Thu Mar 11, 2010 8:01 am

and another one: "comply" goes with "with", yeah?

can you tell i'm editing again?
big hole! big hole! big hole! big man! big man!

User avatar
nanski
Posts: 1072
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:53 am
Last.fm: http://www.last.fm/user/
Location: she lives by the castle

Re: STET this STAT: a grammar emergency thread!

Post by nanski » Thu Mar 11, 2010 9:46 am

and another one: "notify someone of the result"
big hole! big hole! big hole! big man! big man!

moopind
Posts: 1354
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 9:59 am
Last.fm: http://www.last.fm/user/Finkublubou
Location: Sheffield

Re: STET this STAT: a grammar emergency thread!

Post by moopind » Thu Mar 11, 2010 9:58 am

nanski wrote:you would never use "however" and "provided that" together, would you?
Erm, I think you could. Maybe with a comma after however and at the beginning of a sentence, it wouldn't sound so bad. Assuming you mean 'however' in the sense of an adverb.
Daniel & Norbert now on Twitter - @Dentressangular

Bandcamp also? Click me.

moopind
Posts: 1354
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 9:59 am
Last.fm: http://www.last.fm/user/Finkublubou
Location: Sheffield

Re: STET this STAT: a grammar emergency thread!

Post by moopind » Thu Mar 11, 2010 9:58 am

nanski wrote:and another one: "comply" goes with "with", yeah?

can you tell i'm editing again?
I would say so.
Daniel & Norbert now on Twitter - @Dentressangular

Bandcamp also? Click me.

moopind
Posts: 1354
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 9:59 am
Last.fm: http://www.last.fm/user/Finkublubou
Location: Sheffield

Re: STET this STAT: a grammar emergency thread!

Post by moopind » Thu Mar 11, 2010 9:59 am

nanski wrote:and another one: "notify someone of the result"
Sounds fine to me.
Daniel & Norbert now on Twitter - @Dentressangular

Bandcamp also? Click me.

User avatar
nanski
Posts: 1072
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:53 am
Last.fm: http://www.last.fm/user/
Location: she lives by the castle

Re: STET this STAT: a grammar emergency thread!

Post by nanski » Thu Mar 11, 2010 11:59 pm

Thanks! when I'm editing Japanese English, I can tell when things are wrong, but the right way doesn't always sound right either. mostly it's just adding and taking away "s" and "the".
big hole! big hole! big hole! big man! big man!

Concrete
Posts: 1031
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:17 pm

Re: STET this STAT: a grammar emergency thread!

Post by Concrete » Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:43 pm

nanski wrote:and another one: "comply" goes with "with", yeah?
Yes, and "conform" goes with "to".

User avatar
nanski
Posts: 1072
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:53 am
Last.fm: http://www.last.fm/user/
Location: she lives by the castle

Re: STET this STAT: a grammar emergency thread!

Post by nanski » Thu May 06, 2010 8:18 am

"the committee shall be comprised of ..."

I know it's wrong, but is "the committee shall comprise ..."
big hole! big hole! big hole! big man! big man!

User avatar
nanski
Posts: 1072
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:53 am
Last.fm: http://www.last.fm/user/
Location: she lives by the castle

Re: STET this STAT: a grammar emergency thread!

Post by nanski » Thu May 06, 2010 8:23 am

nor

do you only use it after "neither"? or can you use it in any negative sentence in place of "or"
big hole! big hole! big hole! big man! big man!

User avatar
nanski
Posts: 1072
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:53 am
Last.fm: http://www.last.fm/user/
Location: she lives by the castle

Re: STET this STAT: a grammar emergency thread!

Post by nanski » Thu May 06, 2010 8:48 am

dictionary.com is telling me that honorariums is right. it sounds stupid to me.
big hole! big hole! big hole! big man! big man!

User avatar
humblebee
Posts: 10539
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 4:33 pm
Last.fm: http://www.last.fm/user/atomicbeatboy
Location: Sheffields
Contact:

Re: STET this STAT: a grammar emergency thread!

Post by humblebee » Thu May 06, 2010 9:10 am

nanski wrote:"the committee shall be comprised of ..."

I know it's wrong, but is "the committee shall comprise ..."
"the committee shall comprise ..." is right.
nanski wrote:nor

do you only use it after "neither"? or can you use it in any negative sentence in place of "or"
One useful way to understand 'nor' is to think of it as a synonym of 'and not'. I dunno if that helps... can you give us the context?
nanski wrote:dictionary.com is telling me that honorariums is right. it sounds stupid to me.
I can't help with that, sorry. I've never heard of it! I guess it's one of those stadiums/stadia type issues with Latin plurals though? In which case it's more about style and context. If it's the sort of text that says "shall comprise" instead of "will comprise" then I'm guessing it's also the sort of text where you should go with grandiose Latin plurals. Honoraria? So what are they anyway?

User avatar
nanski
Posts: 1072
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:53 am
Last.fm: http://www.last.fm/user/
Location: she lives by the castle

Re: STET this STAT: a grammar emergency thread!

Post by nanski » Thu May 06, 2010 9:18 am

thanks, humblebee. I don't know why I can never be sure about comprise.

the context of the "nor": "Unless half of the committee members are present, a committee meeting shall not be held to discuss nor decide on the recommendations ..."
an honorarium is what academic types get paid when they give a talk or serve on a committee. dictionary.com said that both honorariums and honoraria are acceptable plurals. i guess i'll leave it. This is the most incredibly tedious editing I've ever done. Rules and regulations in Engrish. I really shouldn't have to waste my time on this.
Last edited by nanski on Thu May 06, 2010 9:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
big hole! big hole! big hole! big man! big man!

User avatar
humblebee
Posts: 10539
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 4:33 pm
Last.fm: http://www.last.fm/user/atomicbeatboy
Location: Sheffields
Contact:

Re: STET this STAT: a grammar emergency thread!

Post by humblebee » Thu May 06, 2010 9:32 am

nanski wrote:thanks, humblebee. I don't know why I can never be sure about comprise.
Because other people get it wrong so often that you start to wonder if they must be right after all!
the context of the "nor": "Unless half of the committee members are present, a committee meeting shall not be held to discuss nor decide on the recommendations ..."
Meh. Technically that's a double negative, isn't it? But it sounds right so I'd leave it.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests